Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- Decided
- June 1, 1925
- Docket
- 583, 584
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 2,964 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that the government may not “unreasonably interfere[ ] with the liberty of parents ... to direct the upbringing and education of [their] children” — Blair v. Badenhope (2002)
- holding that the government may not "unreasonably interfere[] with the liberty of parents ... to direct the upbringing and education of [their] children" — Blair v. Badenhope (2002)
- recognizing that "the liberty of parents and guardians" includes the right "to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control" — Littlefield v. Forney Independent School District (2001)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the. opinion of the Court.
These appeals are from decrees, based upon undenied allegations, which granted preliminary orders restraining [*530] appellants .from threatening or attempting to enforce the Compulsory Education Act * adopted November 7, 1922, under the initiative provision of her Constitution by the voters of Oregon. Jud. Code, § 266. They present the same points of law; there are no controverted questions of fact. Rights said to be guaranteed by the federal Constitution were specially set up, and appropriate prayers asked for their protection.
The challenged Act, effective September 1, 1926, requires every parent,, guardian or other person having control or charge or custody of a child between eight and sixteen years to send him “to a public school for the period of time a public school shall be held during the current year” in the district where the child resides; and failure so to do is declared a misdemeanor. There are [*531] exemptions — not specially important here — for children who are not normal, or who have completed the eighth grade; or who reside at considerable distances from any public school, or whose parents or guardians hold special permits from the County Superintendent. The manifest purpose is to compel general attendance at public schools by normal children, between eight and sixteen, who have not completed the eighth grade. And without doubt enforcement of the statute would seriously impair, perhaps destroy, the. profitable features of appellees’ business and greatly diminish the value of their property.
Cite this
Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.