Welch v. Helvering
- Decided
- November 6, 1933
- Docket
- 33
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 9,823 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that the Commissioner's determinations in a notice of deficiency are presumed correct and the taxpayer bears the burden of proving them incorrect — Branson v. Comm'r (2012)
- holding that the Commissioner's determinations are presumed to be correct, and the taxpayer bears the burden of proving them wrong — Cullifer v. Comm'r (2014)
- noting that the Commissioner’s “ruling has the support of a presumption of correctness, and the petitioner has the burden of proving it to be wrong” — Kanter v. Commissioner (2009)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Mr. Justice Cardozo delivered the opinion of the Court.
The question to be determined is whether payments by a taxpayer, who is in business as a commission agent, are allowable deductions in the computation of his income if made to the creditors of a bankrupt corporation in an endeavor to strengthen his own standing and credit.
In 1922 petitioner was the secretary of the E. L. Welch Company, a Minnesota corporation, engaged in the grain business. The company was adjudged an involuntary bankrupt, and had a discharge from its debts. Thereafter the petitioner made a contract with the Kellogg Company to purchase grain for it ón a commission. In order to reestablish his relations with customers whom he had known when acting for the Welch Company and to solidify his credit and standing, he decided to pay the debts of the Welch business so far as he was able. In fulfilment of that resolve, he made payments of substantial amounts during five successive years. In 1924, the commissions [*113] were $18,028.20; the payments $3,975.97; An 1923, the commissions $31,377.07; the payments $11,968.20; in 1926,, the commissions $20,925.25, the payments $12,-815.72; in 1927, the commissions $22,119.61, the payments $7,379.72; and in 1928, the commissions $26,177.56, the payments $11,068.25. The Commissioner ruled that these payments were not deductible from income as ordinary and necessary expenses, but were rather in the nature of capital expenditures, an outlay for the development of reputation and good will. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained the action of the Commissioner (25 B.T.A. 117), and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed. 63 F. (2d) 976. The case is here on certiorari.
Statutes cited
Cite this
Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111 (1933)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.