Case law · Highest court · Federal

Erie Railroad v. Tompkins

Decided
April 25, 1938
Docket
367
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 18,491 timesNo negative treatment found in this library

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

[*69] •Mr. Justice Brandéis delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question for decision is whether the oft-challenged doctrine of Swift v. Tyson[1] shall now be disapproved.

Tompkins, a citizen of Pennsylvania, was injured on a dark night by a passing freight train of the Erie Railroad Company while walking along its right of way at Hughestown in that State. He claimed that the,accident occurred through negligence in the operation, or maintenance, of the train; that h.e was rightfully on the premises as licensee because on a commonly used beaten: footpath which rah for a short distance alongside the tracks; and that he was struck by something which looked like a door projecting from one of the moving cars. To enforce that claim he brought an action in the federal court for southern New York, which had jurisdiction because the company is a corporation of that State. It denied liability; and the case was tried by a jury.

Statutes cited

  • 28 U.S.C. § 725

Cite this

Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.