Case law · Highest court · Federal

Milliken v. Meyer

Decided
January 20, 1941
Docket
66
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 3,141 timesOverruled (not yet verified)Possible negative treatment: overruled (not yet verified) · Carson v. Brodin

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Mr. Justice Douglas delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Colorado Supreme Court held null and void a judgment of the Wyoming court against the claim of Milliken that that judgment was entitled to full faith and credit under the federal constitution. 101 Colo. 564; 76 D. 2d 420; 105 Colo. 532; 100 P. 2d 151. The case is here on a petition for certiorari which we granted because of the substantial character oí tüé federal question which is raised.

The controversy is over a l/64th interest in profits from operation, of certain Colorado oil properties. Transcontinental [1] on August 31,1922, contracted to pay Meyer [*459] 4/64ths of those profits. Milliken asserted a claim to a two-thirds interest in' that 4/64ths share. As a settlement of that dispute Transcontinental on May 3, 1924, contracted to pay Milliken a 2/64ths interest and Milli-ken assigned [2] to Transcontinental all his claims against Meyer pertaining to thé lands in question and to Meyer’s 4/64ths interest in the profits.

Statutes cited

  • 28 U.S.C. § 687

Cite this

Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457 (1941)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.