Case law · Highest court · Federal

United States v. Sherwood

Decided
March 31, 1941
Docket
500
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 3,675 timesNo negative treatment found in this library

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Mr. Justice Stone delivered the opinion of the Court.

The New York Supreme Court, acting under authority of § 795 of the New York Civil' Practice Act, made an order authorizing respondent, as a judgment creditor, to maintain a suit under the Tucker Act of March 3,1887, 24 Stat. 505, § 24 (20) of the Judicial Code, 28 U. S. C. § 41 (20), to recover damages from the United States for breach of its contract with the judgment debtor. The question for decision is whether a United States District Court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit.

The order authorized respondent, who had recovered a judgment against Kaiser in the New York Supreme Court for $5,567.22, to bring suit against the Government to recover for breach of its contract with Kaiser for the construction of a postoffice building. The order [*586] directed that out of .the amount recovered respondent should be entitled to a sum sufficient to satisfy his judgment with interest “as well as costs, disbursements and expenses which may be allowed by the court.”

Statutes cited

Cite this

United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584 (1941)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.