United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
- Decided
- March 28, 1966
- Docket
- 243
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 13,852 timesSuperseded by statute (verified)Possible negative treatment: superseded by statute, abrogated in part (4 of 14 verified; none is a verified overruling) · Hazzard v. Schaaf
What later courts said
- holding that when federal claims are dismissed before trial, federal courts should not separately entertain pendent state claims — Haddrick Byrd v. Robert Shannon (2013)
- holding that supplemental jurisdiction extends to state law claims arising from the same "common nucleus of operative fact" as federal claims — (untitled) (1999)
- holding that when federal claims are dismissed before trial, federal courts should not separately entertain pendent state claims — Humphrey v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (2017)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Mr. Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court.
Respondent Paul Gibbs was awarded compensatory and punitive damages in this action against petitioner United Mine Workers of America (UMW) for alleged violations of § 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 61 Stat. 158, as amended,[1] and of the common law of [*718] Tennessee. The case grew out of the rivalry between the United Mine Workers and the Southern Labor Union over representation of workers in the southern Appalachian coal fields. Tennessee Consolidated Coal Company, not a party here, laid off 100 miners of the UMW’s Local 5881 when it closed one of its mines in southern Tennessee during the spring of 1960. Late that summer, Grundy Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Consolidated, hired respondent as mine superintendent to attempt to open a new mine on Consolidated’s property at nearby Gray’s Creek through use of members of the Southern Labor Union. As part of the arrangement, Grundy also gave respondent a contract to haul the mine’s coal to the nearest railroad loading point.
On August 15 and 16, 1960, armed members of Local 5881 forcibly prevented the opening of the mine, threatening respondent and beating an organizer for the rival union.[2] The members of the local believed Consolidated [*719] had promised them the jobs at the new mine; they insisted that if anyone would do the work, they would. At this time, no representative of the UMW, their international union, was present. George Gilbert, the UMW’s field representative for the area including Local 5881, was away at Middlesboro, Kentucky, attending an Executive Board meeting when the members of the local discovered Grundy’s plan;[3] he did not return to the area until late in the day of August 16. There was uncontradicted testimony that he first learned of the violence while at the meeting, and returned with explicit instructions from his international union superiors to establish a limited picket line, to prevent any further violence, and to see to it that the strike did not spread to neighboring mines. There was no further violence at the mine site; a picket line was maintained there for nine months; and no further attempts were made to open the mine during that period.[4]
Statutes cited
Cite this
United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.