Case law · Highest court · Federal

Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco

Decided
June 5, 1967
Docket
92
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 3,591 timesOverruled on other grounds (not yet verified)Possible negative treatment: overruled on other grounds (not yet verified) · Hussein Mann v. Calumet City, Illinois

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

[*525] Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the Court.

In Frank v. Maryland, 359 U. S. 360, this Court upheld, by a five-to-four vote, a state court conviction of a homeowner who refused to permit a municipal health inspector to enter and inspect his premises without a search warrant. In Eaton v. Price, 364 U. S. 263, a similar conviction was affirmed by an equally divided Court. Since those closely divided decisions, more intensive efforts at all levels of government to contain and eliminate urban blight have led to increasing use of such inspection techniques, while numerous decisions of this Court have more fully defined the Fourth Amendment's effect on state and municipal action.

E. g., Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643;

Statutes cited

Cite this

Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1967)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.