Case law · Highest court · Federal

Washington v. Texas

Decided
June 12, 1967
Docket
649
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 3,395 timesNo negative treatment found in this library

What later courts said

  • holding that right of compulsory process was violated by excluding co-defendant’s testimony concerning circumstances of shooting that was “vital” to defense that co-defendant fired fatal shot — State v. Garron (2003)
  • holding that due process guarantees a criminal defendant the right to present the testimony of defense witnesses — State v. Kerby (2005)
  • holding that the federal compulsory process clause is incorporated in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment — State v. Beeler (2000)

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Mr. Chief Justice Warren delivered the opinion of the Court.

We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the right of a defendant in a criminal case under the [*15] Sixth Amendment[1] to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor is applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment,[2] and whether that right was violated by a state procedural statute providing that persons charged as principals, accomplices, or accessories in the same crime cannot be introduced as witnesses for each other.

Petitioner, Jackie Washington, was convicted in Dallas County, Texas, of murder with malice and was sentenced by a jury to 50 years in prison. The prosecution’s evidence showed that petitioner, an 18-year-old youth, had dated a girl named Jean Carter until her mother had forbidden her to see him. The girl thereafter began dating another boy, the deceased. Evidently motivated by jealousy, petitioner with several other boys began driving around the City of Dallas on the night of August 29, 1964, looking for a gun. The search eventually led to one Charles Fuller, who joined the group with his shotgun. After obtaining some shells from another source, the group of boys proceeded to Jean Carter’s home, where Jean, her family and the deceased were having supper. Some of the boys threw bricks at the house and then ran back to the car, leaving petitioner and Fuller alone in front of the house with the shotgun. At the sound of the bricks the deceased and Jean Carter’s mother rushed out on the porch to investigate. The shotgun was fired by either petitioner or Fuller, and the [*16] deceased was fatally wounded. Shortly afterward petitioner and Fuller came running back to the car where the other boys waited, with Fuller carrying the shotgun.

Cite this

Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14 (1967)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.