Case law · Highest court · Federal

Wolff v. McDonnell

Decided
June 26, 1974
Docket
73-679
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 12,327 timesAbrogated in part on other grounds (not yet verified)Possible negative treatment: abrogated in part on other grounds (not yet verified) · Hobbs v. Cappelluti

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the Court.

We granted the petition for writ of certiorari in this case, 414 U. S. 1156 (1974), because it raises important questions concerning the administration of a state prison.

Respondent, on behalf of himself and other inmates of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, Lincoln, Nebraska, filed a complaint under 42 U. S. C. § 1983[1] challenging several of the practices, rules, and regulations of the Complex. For present purposes, the pertinent [*543] allegations were that disciplinary proceedings did not comply with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution; that the inmate legal assistance program did not meet constitutional standards, and that the regulations governing the inspection of mail to and from attorneys for inmates were unconstitutionally restrictive. Respondent requested damages and injunctive relief.

Statutes cited

Cite this

Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.