Warth v. Seldin
- Decided
- June 25, 1975
- Docket
- 73-2024
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 10,875 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- recognizing that an organization may sue on its own behalf for injuries it has sustained — The Cetacean Community v. George W. Bush, President of the United States of America Donald H. Rumsfeld, United States of America Secretary of Defense (2004)
- holding that usually in suits to challenge exclusionary zoning practices "the initial focus should be on a particular project" — Jackson v. Okaloosa County (1994)
- recognizing that injury required by Art. Ill may be based on “statutes creating legal rights” (internal quotation marks omitted) — Strubel v. Comenity Bank (2016)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
[*493] Mr. Justice Powell delivered the opinion of the Court.
Petitioners, various organizations and individuals resident in the Rochester, N. Y., metropolitan area, brought this action in the District Court for the Western District of New York against the town of Penfield, an incorporated municipality adjacent to Rochester, and against members of Penfield’s Zoning, Planning, and Town Boards. Petitioners claimed that the town’s zoning ordinance, by its terms and as enforced by the defendant board members, respondents here, effectively excluded persons of low and moderate income from living in the town, in contravention of petitioners’ First, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights and in violation of 42 U. S. C. §§ 1981, 1982, and 1983. The District Court dismissed the complaint and denied a motion to add petitioner Housing Council in the Monroe County Area, Inc., as party-plaintiff and also a motion by petitioner Rochester Home Builders Association, Inc., for leave to intervene as party-plaintiff. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed, holding that none of the plaintiffs, and neither Housing Council nor Home Builders Association, had standing to prosecute the action. 495 F. 2d 1187 (1974). We granted the petition for certiorari. 419 U. S. 823 (1974). For reasons that differ in certain respects from those upon which the Court of Appeals relied, we affirm.
I .
Statutes cited
Cite this
Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490 (1975)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.