Case law · Highest court · Federal

Rakas v. Illinois

Decided
January 15, 1979
Docket
77-5781
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 6,103 timesAbrogated in part on other grounds (not yet verified)Possible negative treatment: abrogated in part on other grounds, abrogated in part (not yet verified) · VanDyck v. United States

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Mr. Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court.

Petitioners were convicted of armed robbery in the Circuit Court of Kankakee County, Ill., and their convictions were affirmed on appeal. At their trial, the prosecution offered into evidence a sawed-off rifle and rifle shells that had been seized by police during a search of an automobile in which petitioners had been passengers. Neither petitioner is the owner of the automobile and neither has ever asserted that he owned the rifle or shells seized. The Illinois Appellate Court held that petitioners lacked standing to object to the allegedly [*130] unlawful search and seizure and denied their motion to suppress the evidence. We granted certiorari in light of the obvious importance of the issues raised to the administration of criminal justice, 435 TJ. S. 922 (1978), and now affirm.

I

Cite this

Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 (1979)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.