Case law · Highest court · Federal

Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex

Decided
May 29, 1979
Docket
78-201
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 3,299 timesAbrogated on other grounds (not yet verified)Possible negative treatment: abrogated on other grounds (not yet verified) · People v. Cruz

What later courts said

  • holding that “[t]here is no constitutional or inherent right of a convicted person to be conditionally released before the expiration of a valid sentence” — Makowski v. Governor (2014)
  • holding that a state statute which “provides no more than a mere hope a benefit will be obtained…is not protected by due process.” — Thomas v. Leblanc (2019)
  • holding that for purposes of due process requirements, parole release and parole revocation are not the same — Odoms v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (2020)

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Mr. Chief Justice Burger delivered the opinion of the Court.

We granted certiorari to decide whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies to discretionary parole-release determinations made by the Nebraska Board of Parole, and, if so, whether the procedures the Board currently provides meet constitutional requirements.

I

Statutes cited

Cite this

Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1 (1979)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.