Case law · Highest court · Federal

New York v. Belton

Decided
September 23, 1981
Docket
80-328
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 3,483 timesDisapproved (verified)Possible negative treatment: disapproved, overruled, abrogated, overruled in part, abrogated on other grounds, overruled on other grounds, superseded (1 of 34 verified; none is a verified overruling) · People v. Branner

What later courts said

  • holding that even a search incident to arrest in a vehicle does not itself permit a search of the trunk — Illinois v. Caballes (2005)
  • holding that a police officer may conduct a search of the passenger compartment of an automobile incident to arrest — Vafaiyan v. State (2008)
  • holding that search incident to arrest may include contents of any container within passenger compartment — United States v. Martin Robert Czeck (1997)

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Justice Stewart delivered the opinion of the Court.

When the occupant of an automobile is subjected to a lawful custodial arrest, does the constitutionally permissible scope of a search incident to his arrest include the passenger compartment of the automobile in which he was riding? That is the question at issue in the present case.

I

Cite this

New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.