Texas v. Brown
- Decided
- April 19, 1983
- Docket
- 81-419
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 3,147 timesOverruled on other grounds (not yet verified)Possible negative treatment: overruled on other grounds, abrogated on other grounds (not yet verified) · People v. Lieng
What later courts said
- holding that probable cause “does not demand any showing that such a belief be correct or more likely true than false” — United States v. Diana Gonzales Buchanan, Fedell Anderson, Vernon Bonner, and John Buchanan (1996)
- holding that the discussion of a contested issue in a plurality opinion is "not a binding precedent" if it "has never been expressly adopted by a majority of this Court" — Joseph M. Destefano v. Emergency Housing Group, Inc. (2001)
- holding that the officer’s change in position, which included “ben[ding] down at an angle, . . . is irrelevant to Fourth Amendment analysis” — Dwight Patton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (2015)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Justice Rehnquist announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which The Chief Justice, Justice White, and Justice O’Connor joined.
Respondent Clifford James Brown was convicted in the District Court of Tarrant County, Tex., for possession of heroin in violation of state law. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his conviction, holding that certain evidence should have been suppressed because it was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[1] 617 S. W. 2d 196. That court rejected the [*733] State’s contention that the so-called “plain view” doctrine justified the police seizure. Because of apparent uncertainty concerning the scope and applicability of this doctrine, we granted certiorari, 457 U. S. 1116, and now reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
On a summer evening in June 1979, Tom Maples, an officer of the Fort Worth police force, assisted in setting up a routine driver’s license checkpoint on East Allen Street in that city. Shortly before midnight Maples stopped an automobile driven by respondent Brown, who was alone. Standing alongside the driver’s window of Brown’s car, Maples asked him for his driver’s license. At roughly the same time, Maples shined his flashlight into the car and saw Brown withdraw his right hand from his right pants pocket. Caught between the two middle fingers of the hand was an opaque, green party balloon, knotted about one-half inch from the tip. Brown let the balloon fall to the seat beside his leg, and then reached across the passenger seat and opened the glove compartment.
Cite this
Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 (1983)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.