Case law · Highest court · Federal

Bowen v. Yuckert

Decided
June 8, 1987
Docket
85-1409
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 9,437 timesNo negative treatment found in this library

What later courts said

  • holding that the claimant has the burden of showing “at step two that he has a medically severe impairment or combination of impairments” — Cowan v. Astrue (2008)
  • holding that the claimant has the burden of proving that the impairments meet the criteria of the Listings — Randall Stewart v. Carolyn Colvin (2017)
  • holding that both standards are consistent with the language and legislative history of the Act — Lisowicz v. Comm Social Security (2002)

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Justice Powell delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question in this case is whether the Secretary of Health and Human Services may deny a claim for Social Security disability benefits on the basis of a determination that the claimant does not suffer from a medically severe impairment that significantly limits the claimant’s ability to perform basic work activities.

[*140] h-i Title II of the Social Security Act (Act), 49 Stat. 620, as amended, provides for the payment of insurance benefits to persons who have contributed to the program and who suffer from a physical or mental disability. 42 U. S. C. §423(a)(1)(D) (1982 ed., Supp. III). Title XVI of the Act provides for the payment of disability benefits to indigent persons under the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program. § 1382(a). Both titles of the Act define “disability” as the “inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months . . . .” §423(d)(1)(A). See § 1382c(a)(3)(A). The Act further provides that an individual “shall be determined to be under a disability only if his physical or mental impairment or impairments are of such severity that he is not only unable to do his previous work but cannot, considering his age, education, and work experience, engage in any other kind of substantial gainful work which exists in the national economy, regardless of whether such work exists in the immediate area in which he lives, or whether a specific job vacancy exists for him, or whether he would be hired if he applied for work.” §§ 423(d)(2)(A), 1382c(a)(3)(B) (1982 ed. and Supp. III).

Statutes cited

Cite this

Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137 (1987)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.