United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.
- Decided
- December 1, 1987
- Docket
- 86-651
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 2,748 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that for the Court of Appeals to draw inferences from known facts was an "inappropriate" exercise in factfinding — (untitled) (1995)
- holding that court's refusal to enforce arbitrator's interpretation of contract is limited to situations where contracts as interpreted would violate explicit, well-defined public policy — Fidelity & Deposit Company Of Maryland v. Thomas R. Conner (1992)
- holding that judicial deference ends where an arbitrator exceeds the express limitations of the contractual mandate — Houston Lighting & Power Company v. International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 66 (1995)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Justice White delivered the opinion of the Court.
The issue for decision involves several aspects of when a federal court may refuse to enforce an arbitration award rendered under a collective-bargaining agreement.
I
Statutes cited
Cite this
United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc., 484 U.S. 29 (1987)Read the full opinion
Free account needed
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.