Case law · Highest court · Federal

Sullivan v. Zebley

Decided
February 20, 1990
Docket
88-1377
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 2,580 timesSuperseded by statute (verified)Possible negative treatment: superseded by statute, superseded on other grounds (3 of 36 verified; none is a verified overruling) · Duarte v. Kijakazi

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

[*523] Justice Blackmun delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case concerns a facial challenge to the method used by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to determine whether a child is “disabled” and therefore eligible for benefits under the Supplemental Security Income Program, Title XVI of the Social Security Act, as added, 86 Stat. 1465, and amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1381 et seq. (1982 ed. and Supp. V).

[*524] f — Í In 1972, Congress enacted the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Program to assist “individuals who have attained age 65 or are blind or disabled” by setting a guaranteed minimum income level for such persons. 42 U. S. C. § 1381 (1982 ed.). The program went into effect January 1, 1974. Currently, about 2 million claims for SSI benefits are adjudicated each year. Of these, about 100,000 are child-disability claims.[1]

Statutes cited

Cite this

Sullivan v. Zebley, 493 U.S. 521 (1990)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.