Case law · Highest court · Federal

Auer v. Robbins

Decided
February 19, 1997
Docket
95-897
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 2,686 timesSuperseded by statute (verified)Possible negative treatment: superseded by statute (1 of 2 verified; none is a verified overruling) · Roseanne Cronin v. United States Postal Service

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

[*454] Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), 52 Stat. 1060, as amended, 29 U. S. C. §§201 et seq., exempts “bona fide executive, administrative, or professional” employees from overtime pay requirements. This case presents the question whether the Secretary of Labor’s “salary-basis” test for determining an employee’s exempt status reflects a permissible reading of the statute as it applies to public-sector employees. We also consider whether the Secretary has reasonably interpreted the salary-basis test to deny an [*455] employee salaried status (and thus grant him overtime pay) when his compensation may “as a practical matter” be adjusted in ways inconsistent with the test.

I

Statutes cited

Cite this

Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.