Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
- Decided
- June 25, 1997
- Docket
- 96-270
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 4,991 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that facilitating small claims is “[t]he policy at the very core of the class action mechanism” — In re Scotts EZ Seed Litigation (2015)
- recognizing that in 1991 the Judicial Conference Ad Hoc Committee on Asbestos Litigation had called for "federal legislation creating a national asbestos dispute-resolution scheme” — State Ex Rel. Mobil Corp. v. Gaughan (2002)
- holding that a class representative must be part of the class and possess the same interest and suffer the same injury as the class members — Matyasovszky v. Housing Authority of City of Bridgeport (2005)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
[*597] Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court.
This ease concerns the legitimacy under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of a class-action certification sought to achieve global settlement of current and future asbestos-related claims. The class proposed for certification potentially encompasses hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of individuals tied together by this commonality: Each was, or some day may be, adversely affected by past exposure to asbestos products manufactured by one or more of 20 companies. Those companies, defendants in the lower courts, are petitioners here.
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania certified the class for settlement only, finding that the proposed settlement was fair and that representation and notice had been adequate. That court enjoined class members from separately pursuing asbestos-related personal-injury suits in any court, federal or state, pending the issuance of a final order. The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated the District Court’s orders, holding that the class certification failed to satisfy Rule 23’s requirements in several critical respects. We affirm the Court of Appeals’ judgment.
Statutes cited
Cite this
Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.