Case law · Highest court · Federal

Strickler v. Greene

Decided
June 17, 1999
Docket
98-5864
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 4,383 timesNo negative treatment found in this library

What later courts said

  • holding that prejudice under Brady requires a " 'reasonable probability' that the result of the trial would have been different” — Waiters v. Lee (2017)
  • holding that prejudice under Brady requires a “‘reasonable probability’ that the result of the trial would have been different” — Waiters v. Lee (2017)
  • holding that in order to find a Brady violation, “the evidence must have been suppressed by the State, either willfully or inadvertently” — Michael W. Benge v. David Johnson, Warden (2007)

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Justice Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court.[†] The District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus and vacated his capital murder conviction and death sentence on the grounds that the Commonwealth had failed to disclose important exculpatory evidence and that petitioner had not, in consequence, received a fair trial. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed because petitioner had not raised his constitutional claim at his trial or in state collateral proceedings. In addition, the Fourth Circuit concluded that petitioner’s claim was, “in any event, without merit.” App. 418, n. 8.[1] Finding the legal question presented by this [*266] case considerably more difficult than the Fourth Circuit, we granted certiorari, 525 U. S. 809 (1998), to consider (1) whether the Commonwealth violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963), and its progeny; (2) whether there was an acceptable “cause” for petitioner’s failure to raise this claim in state court; and (3), if so, whether he suffered prejudice sufficient to excuse his procedural default.

I

In the early evening of January 5,1990, Leanne Whitlock, an African-American sophomore at James Madison University, was abducted from a local shopping center and robbed and murdered. In separate trials, both petitioner and Ronald Henderson were convicted of all three offenses. Henderson was convicted of first-degree murder, a noncapital offense, whereas petitioner was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death.[2]

Cite this

Strickler v. Greene, 527 U.S. 263 (1999)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.