Case law · Highest court · Federal

Slack v. McDaniel

Decided
April 26, 2000
Docket
98-6322
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 41,291 timesSuperseded by statute (not yet verified)Possible negative treatment: superseded by statute (not yet verified) · United States v. Mabry

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court."

We are called upon to resolve a series of issues regarding the law of habeas corpus, including questions of the proper application of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). We hold as follows:

[*478] First, when a habeas corpus petitioner seeks to initiate an appeal of the dismissal of a habeas corpus petition after April 24, 1996 (the effective date of AEDPA), the right to appeal is governed by the certificate of appealability (COA) requirements now found at 28 U. S. C. § 2253(c) (1994 ed., Supp. III). This is true whether the habeas corpus petition was filed in the district court before or after AEDPA’s effective date.

Statutes cited

Cite this

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.