Case law · Highest court · Federal

Apprendi v. New Jersey

Decided
June 26, 2000
Docket
99-478
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Federal

Cited 28,372 timesNo negative treatment found in this library

What later courts said

  • holding that it is for the jury, not the judge, to decide defendant’s intent for purposes of sentence enhancement — State v. Hoskins (2000)
  • concluding that 18 U.S.C. § 3553 [b] [1], which makes Federal Sentencing Guidelines mandatory, is incompatible with Blakely and must be invalidated — State v. Fagan (2006)
  • holding that all facts that would enhance the defendant's sentence above the statutory maximum must be found by a jury — State v. Collins (2008)

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Justice Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court.

A New Jersey statute classifies the possession of a firearm for an unlawful purpose as a “second-degree” offense. N. J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:39-4(a) (West 1995). Such an offense is punishable by imprisonment for “between five years and 10 years.” §2C:4S-6(a)(2). A separate statute, described by that State’s Supreme Court as a “hate crime” law, provides for an “extended term” of imprisonment if the trial judge finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that “[t]he de [*469] fendant in committing the crime acted with a purpose to intimidate an individual or group of individuals because of race, color, gender, handicap, religion, sexual orientation or ethnicity.” N. J. Stat. Ann. §2C:44-3(e) (West Supp. 1999-2000). The extended term authorized by the hate crime law for second-degree offenses is imprisonment for “between 10 and 20 years.” § 2C:43-7(a)(3).

The question presented is whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that a factual determination authorizing an increase in the maximum prison sentence for an offense from 10 to 20 years be made by a jury on the basis of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Statutes cited

Cite this

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.