United States v. Arvizu
- Decided
- January 15, 2002
- Docket
- 00-1519
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 3,936 timesOverruled in part on other grounds (not yet verified)Possible negative treatment: overruled in part on other grounds, overruled on other grounds (not yet verified) · Frando v. Gore
What later courts said
- holding that a “determination that reasonable suspicion exists ... need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct” — United States v. Brown, Rocky (2003)
- concluding that in the "totality of the circumstances” analysis required for a reasonable-suspicion determination in the Terry context, inferences may be drawn from the cumulative impact of activities that appear innocent when viewed individually — Shrestha v. Holder (2010)
- recognizing that determination of reasonable suspicion requires consideration by courts of “the ‘totality of the circumstances’ of each case----” — Whittington v. State (2002)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
[*268] Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court.
Respondent Ralph Arvizu was stopped by a border patrol agent while driving on an unpaved road in a remote area of southeastern Arizona. A search of his vehicle turned up more than 100 pounds of marijuana. The District Court for the District of Arizona denied respondent’s motion to suppress, but the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. In the course of its opinion, it categorized certain factors relied upon by the District Court as simply out of bounds in deciding whether there was “reasonable suspicion” for the stop. We hold that the Court of Appeals’ methodology was contrary to our prior decisions and that it reached the wrong result in this case.
On an afternoon in January 1998, Agent Clinton Stoddard was working at a border patrol checkpoint along U. S. Highway 191 approximately 30 miles north of Douglas, Arizona. App. 22, 24. See Appendix, infra (containing a map of the area noting the location of the checkpoint and other points important to this ease). Douglas has a population of about 13,000 and is situated on the United States-Mexico border in the southeastern part of the State. Only two highways lead north from Douglas. See App. 157. Highway 191 leads north to Interstate 10, which passes through Tucson and Phoenix. State Highway 80 heads northeast through less populated areas toward New Mexico, skirting south and east of the portion of the Coronado National Forest that lies approximately 20 miles northeast of Douglas.[1]
Statutes cited
Cite this
United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.