Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
- Decided
- July 24, 2008
- Docket
- 05-36128
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 3,454 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that, when the ALJ errs, we must inquire “whether the ALJ’s decision remains legally valid, despite such error” — Adrian Burrell v. Carolyn W. Colvin (2014)
- concluding that ALJ’s error was harmless in light of other valid reason given for adverse credibility determination — Sheena Presley-Carrillo v. Nancy Berryhill (2017)
- holding that this Court need not address arguments that were not argued with any specificity — Julie Loewen v. Nancy Berryhill (2017)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GRABER.
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the district court properly affirmed the Commissioner’s denial of Social Security Disability Insurance benefits in this case.
Statutes cited
Cite this
Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 533 F.3d 1155 (2008)Read the full opinion
Free account needed
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.