Hebbe v. Pliler
- Decided
- July 29, 2010
- Docket
- 07-17265
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 4,042 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that pro se complaints should continue to be liberally 23 construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) — (PC) Sosa v. CSATF Warden (2021)
- holding that pro se complaints should continue to be liberally 27 construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) — Bey v. Garcia (2021)
- holding that Iqbal did not alter the 12 “obligation” to construe pro se pleadings liberally — Merritt v. Redwoods Investments, LLC (2020)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Concurrence by Judge FRIEDMAN.
ORDER The opinion filed on July 29, 2010, and reported at 611 F.3d 1202, is hereby amended so as to conform with the amended opinion filed herewith. The concurring opinion filed on that date remains unchanged.
The petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the court and shall be deemed to apply to the amended opinion, unless within 14 days of the date of this order the appellees withdraw or amend their petition.
Statutes cited
Cite this
Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338 (2010)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.