Rosell v. Esco
- Decided
- September 12, 1989
- Docket
- 89-C-0607
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Louisiana
Cited 5,672 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- “[W]hen the court of appeal finds that a reversible error of law…was made in the trial court, it is required to redetermine the facts de novo from the entire record and render a judgment on the merits.” — Environmental Safety & Health Consulting Services, Inc. v. Jonathan Fowler (2020)
- “[W]hen the 13 court of appeal finds that a reversible error of law…was made in the trial court, it is required to redetermine the facts de novo from the entire record and render a judgment on the merits.” — Sherome Hankton v. the State of Louisiana, Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans (University Hospital), Through the Board of Supervisors at Louisiana State University and Dr. John Doe (2020)
- ... if the trial court or jury findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse even though convinced that had it been sitting as trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently. — Larrea v. Cefalu (2015)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
549 So.2d 840 (1989) June ROSELL v. ESCO, d/b/a Jolly Elevator Corp., et al. No. 89-C-0607.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
September 12, 1989. *842 Samuel C. Gainsburgh and Nick F. Noriea, Jr., Gainsburgh, Benjamin, Fallon, David & Ates, New Orleans, for applicant.
Cite this
Rosell v. Esco, 549 So. 2d 840 (1989)Read the full opinion
Free account needed
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.