State Ex Rel. Glover v. State

What later courts said

• holding limitation period on application for post-conviction relief did not “suspend the writ of habeas corpus because ‘suspension,’ insofar as . . . this state’s constitution is concerned, refers to suspension of the traditional common law writ of habeas corpus” — Brown v. Warden (ORDER) (2019)
• affirming judgment of court of appeal, which barred Glover’s claim pursuant to the statute — Glover v. Cain & Ieyoub (1997)
• “Traditionally, the writ of habeas corpus was used to: (1) insure that necessary pre-trial procedures were followed; (2) examine whether the person had been committed pursuant to judicial process; and (3) ascertain whether the committing court had jurisdiction.” — Brown v. Warden (ORDER) (2019)

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.