Case law · Highest court · Texas

Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Knott

Decided
December 19, 2003
Docket
02-0485
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Texas

Cited 3,329 timesNo negative treatment found in this library

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Justice WAINWRIGHT delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this insurance coverage dispute, we construe the definition of total disability found in two insurance policies. Interpreting the policies as they are written, we hold that an insured is totally disabled when he is unable to perform all of the important and usual duties of his occupation. Because the insured in this case was able to perform some of the important and usual duties of his occupation as a physician, he was not totally disabled under the policies’ terms. We also conclude that the insured’s extra-contractual claims are barred by limitations. The trial court was correct in granting the motions for summary judgment. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals in part and affirm in part.

I. Factual and Procedural Background In 1968, Dr. James Knott began practicing obstetrics and gynecology with Dr. Robert Kuhne. Around 1970, the doctors formed a professional association, Kuhne & Knott Gynecological Associates, which was eventually renamed Richardson Women’s Clinic.

Cite this

Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Knott, 128 S.W.3d 211 (2003)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.