People v. Enoch
- Decided
- February 11, 1988
- Docket
- 59390
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Illinois
Cited 3,273 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that to properly preserve an issue for review, both a trial objection and a written post-trial motion are required — People v. Shatner (1996)
- concluding that the State’s failure to object to the oral form of the motion for new trial waived the written motion requirement — People v. Salem (2016)
- holding that the doctrine of waiver does not apply when a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence — People v. Williams (2014)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
JUSTICE RYAN delivered the opinion of the court:
The defendant, Willie Enoch, was charged under an indictment with four counts of murder (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 9 — 1(a)), and one count each of aggravated kidnapping (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 10— 2), attempted rape (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 8— 4), and armed robbery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 18 — 2). Following a jury trial in the circuit court of Peoria County, Enoch was acquitted on the charges of armed robbery and murder in the course of armed robbery, but was convicted of all other charges. He waived a jury at the death penalty hearing, and the circuit judge found the defendant eligible for the death penalty on the basis of the two felony-murder convictions: murder in the course of attempted rape and murder in the course of aggravated kidnapping (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 9 — 1(b)(6)). The judge found no mitigating factor sufficient to preclude imposition of the death penalty, and sentenced the defendant to death. The sentence was stayed pending direct appeal to this court. Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, §4(b); 107 Ill. 2d R. 603.
The victim, Armanda Kay Burns, was a 25-year-old housekeeping supervisor employed by the Methodist Medical Center in Peoria. She lived in a basement apartment near the medical center. On April 22, 1983, several members of the housekeeping staff, including the victim, were gathered in the victim’s office at the hospital at about 11:30 p.m. All were working the 3 p.m. to 11:45 p.m. shift. Three staff members testified that the defendant entered the office and asked where his brother was. They also saw the defendant speaking with the victim. As two of these witnesses left the hospital at the end of the work shift, they saw the victim and the defendant walking together toward her apartment. One witness testified that he saw them within 100 feet of the victim’s dwelling and that she waved at him when he blew his horn.
Cite this
People v. Enoch, 522 N.E.2d 1124 (1988)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.