Case law · Highest court · Texas

Cain v. Bain

Decided
February 12, 1986
Docket
C-4764
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Texas

Cited 4,555 timesNo negative treatment found in this library

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

PER CURIAM.

James and Karen Bain purchased a 20-year-old house in 1976 from George and Carroll Banks. The real estate agent for the transaction was an employee of James Cain Company. In 1978, the Bains tried to sell their house but were unable to find a buyer because of a foundation defect. They sued James Cain Company for violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The trial court granted Cain’s Motion for Directed Verdict and rendered a take nothing judgment against the Bains. In an unpublished opinion, the court of appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment. Tex.R.Civ.P. 452.

The trial court submitted Issue No. 7 asking the jury:

Cite this

Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175 (1986)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.