Kim Brown-Hunter v. Carolyn W. Colvin
- Decided
- August 4, 2015
- Docket
- 13-15213
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 2,587 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that the ALJ’s failure to identify the conflict between the claimant’s medical records and pain testimony constituted reversible error — Austin v. Kijakazi(CONSENT) (2021)
- holding that ALJ must support his reasoning in rejecting subjective testimony with sufficient specificity so that the reviewing court can conduct a meaningful review — Tyler Delanoy v. Nancy Berryhill (2017)
- concluding that the ALJ erred by summarizing the evidence that supported the RFC determination without specifically identifying the reasons for rejecting claimant’s testimony — Katrina McLamb v. Nancy Berryhill (2018)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
ORDER The court’s opinion filed August 4, 2015, and appearing at 798 F.3d 749 (9th Cir. 2015), is hereby amended. An amended opinion is filed herewith.
With this amended opinion, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. That petition is therefore DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.
AMENDED OPINION WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
Statutes cited
Cite this
Kim Brown-Hunter v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487 (2015)Read the full opinion
Free account needed
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.