Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, Incorporated
- Decided
- September 22, 1976
- Docket
- 75-1645 to 75-1647 and 75-2158
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 2,543 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that a presumption of injury arises from the occurrence of 6 | unreasonable delay — Enerkon Solar International, Inc. v. Capello (2022)
- holding that a presumption of injury arises from the occurrence of 5 unreasonable delay — Devos v. Music Tribe Commercial NV, Inc. (2022)
- holding that a 1} presumption of injury arises from the occurrence of unreasonable delay — Injazat Technology Fund B.S.C. v. Najafi (2022)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
This case presents an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing with [*524] prejudice the plaintiff’s complaint against twenty individual directors of Air West, Incorporated because of her failure to prosecute the action with reasonable diligence. The dismissals were granted under four separate motions, but all involve the same issues and so were consolidated for appeal. We hold that the district judge did not abuse the discretion granted to him under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and thus we affirm the order of dismissal.
I.
Cite this
Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, Incorporated, 542 F.2d 522 (1976)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.