Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of Alaska
- Decided
- March 29, 1982
- Docket
- 79-4553
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 4,631 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that vague and conclusory allegations do not suffice to withstand a 11 motion to dismiss — (PC) J'Weial v. CDCR (2023)
- concluding that vague and conclusory allegations 19 concerning the involvement of supervisory personnel in civil rights violations are not sufficient to 20 support a claim — (PC) Clark v. Saipher (2022)
- holding that vague and conclusory allegations of official participation in civil rights violations in § 1983 claim insufficient to withstand motion to dismiss — Lambert v. Andrews (2003)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
673 F.2d 266 28 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1577, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,646, 3 Ed. Law Rep. 308 Richard C. IVEY, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, University of Alaska, Foster F. Diebold, Neil D. Humphrey, Charles O. Ferguson, Robert W. Hiatt, Elaine Ramos, Thomas B. Gruenig, Jane Demmert, Alaska Commission on Post-Secondary Education, Kerry Romesburg, Inupiat Council on Postsecondary Education, Inc., Ross Dixon, Lyle O. Wright, North Slope Borough, and Eben Hopson, Appellees/Defendants.
No. 79-4553.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Statutes cited
Cite this
Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266 (1982)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.