People v. Lewis
- Decided
- July 26, 2021
- Docket
- S260598
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- California
Cited 2,707 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- suggesting due process requires the appointment of counsel once it has been determined that a petitioner has stated a nonfrivolous claim — People v. Guice CA5 (2022)
- “ ‘[I]f the record, including the court’s own documents, “contain[s] facts refuting the allegations made in the petition,” then “the court is justified in making a credibility determination adverse to the petitioner.” ’ ”]. — People v. Wilson (2021)
- “[W]e now turn to the question of whether a trial court can rely on the 16 record of conviction in determining whether that single prima facie showing is made. The 17 answer is yes.” — Torricellas v. Core (2023)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. VINCE E. LEWIS, Defendant and Appellant.
S260598 Second Appellate District, Division One B295998 Los Angeles County Superior Court TA117431 July 26, 2021 Justice Groban authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and Justices Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger, and Jenkins concurred.
PEOPLE v. LEWIS S260598 Opinion of the Court by Groban, J.
Cite this
People v. Lewis, 281 Cal. Rptr. 3d 521 (2021)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.