United States of America and Robert W. Wallace v. Claude R. Wilson, Jr., and Modes, Inc.
- Decided
- March 7, 1989
- Docket
- 88-1157
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 3,065 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that, ifno objections to a magistrate judge’s report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”’ — Teer v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration (2022)
- holding that, ifno objections to a magistrate judge’s report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” — McDonald v. Commissioner of Social Security (2022)
- holding that, ifno objections to a magistrate judge’s report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” — Clayton v. Commissioner of Social Security (2021)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
PER CURIAM:
I.
Factual and Procedural Background.
Statutes cited
Cite this
United States of America and Robert W. Wallace v. Claude R. Wilson, Jr., and Modes, Inc., 864 F.2d 1219 (1989)Read the full opinion
Free account needed
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.