Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & Company
- Decided
- May 25, 1990
- Docket
- 87-5673
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 2,773 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- explaining that respondents must “present affirmative evidence in order to defeat a properly supported motion for summary judgment” (citations omitted) — James v. City of Detroit (2019)
- noting that it is not the district court’s “duty to search the entire record to establish that it is bereft of a genuine issue of material fact” — Jake Finley v. Manuel Mora (2023)
- observing that “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party, there is no genuine issue for trial” — Gobble v. Bristol Gynecology and Obstetrics, P.C. (2024)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
BERTELSMAN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION This is a securities/commodities fraud action, originally brought in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. It alleges a broker’s violations of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 6, 6a, 6c, 6d, 6o and 25; the Securities Act of 1933,15 U.S.C. §§ 111 and 77q; the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 78(b), 17 C.F.R. §§ 240.10b-5 and 240.-17a-3; and the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 and 1964;[1] and several pendent state claims. Appellants (plaintiffs in the court below) challenge on appeal the district court’s summary judgment orders dismissing all of plaintiffs’ claims and upholding defendants’ counterclaim for a deficiency balance due on plaintiffs’ account.
In the interests of brevity, the appellees are referred to collectively to include J.C. Bradford & Co., the commodities exchange brokerage firm; Ken Graybeal, a local securities broker authorized only to accept and transmit commodities trades to a commodities broker in another of the firm’s offices; Robert McCrackin, Douglas 0. Kitchens, and Ray Richardson, all commodities brokers in the J.C. Bradford organization alleged to have advised appellants or transacted trades for them. Graybeal was the main point of contact between appellants and the firm.
Statutes cited
- 7 U.S.C. § 6
- 15 U.S.C. § 111
- 18 U.S.C. § 1962
- 29 U.S.C. § 216
Cite this
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & Company, 886 F.2d 1472 (1990)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.