Hall v. Bellmon
- Decided
- June 3, 1991
- Docket
- 90-6326
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 2,581 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that even pro se litigants cannot rely on conclusory, unsubstantiated allegations to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion — Roquemore v. Smith (2024)
- holding that courts must construe pro se litigant’s pleadings liberally and hold them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers — Hampton v. Barclays Bank Delaware (2020)
- holding that courts must construe pro se litigant’s pleadings liberally and hold them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers — Knight v. United States Office of Personnel Management (2024)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
935 F.2d 1106 19 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1217 Kenneth E. HALL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry BELLMON, Governor; Robert H. Henry, Attorney General; Gary Maynard; Steven Kaiser; Captain E. Smith; Sgt. B. Jones; Buddy Honaker; Two Unnamed Guards, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6326.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Statutes cited
Cite this
Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106 (1991)Read the full opinion
Free account needed
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.