Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana Corporation
- Decided
- November 23, 1992
- Docket
- 91-16385
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 4,522 timesAbrogated on other grounds (verified)Abrogated on other grounds (verified) · Martinez v. Novato Healthcare Center, LLC
What later courts said
- holding that “[f]ederal jurisdiction must be rejected if there is any doubt as to the 19 right of removal in the first instance” — Lewis v. ABB Optical Group LLC (2019)
- holding that allegations based on “to the best of my knowledge and belief” are insufficient — G2 Secure Staff, LLC v. ABM Industries Inc. (2021)
- holding that allegations based on “to the best of my knowledge and belief” are insufficient — Maria Evans v. Costco Wholesale Corporation (2020)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
PER CURIAM:
Frank D. Gaus appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Mobay Corporation. [1]
Gaus alleged breach of contract, intentional interference with contractual relationships, and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage.- We vacate the judgment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and remand to the district court with instructions to remand to the state court.
Statutes cited
Cite this
Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana Corporation, 980 F.2d 564 (1992)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.