Martinez v. Ryan
- Decided
- March 20, 2012
- Docket
- 10-1001
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 4,115 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- recognizing that “[a] prisoner may-obtain federal review of a defaulted claim by showing cause for the default and prejudice from a violation of federal law.” — Williams v. Trammell (2015)
- concluding that its “narrow exception” “does not concern attorney errors in other kinds of proceedings, including appeals from initial-review collateral proceedings’’ — Sentoryia Young v. Bruce Westbrooks (2017)
- concluding that its “narrow exception” “does not concern attorney errors in other kinds of proceedings, including appeals from initial-review collateral proceedings” — Sentoryia Young v. Bruce Westbrooks (2017)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court'.
The State of Arizona does not permit a convicted person alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel to raise that claim on direct review. Instead, the prisoner must bring the claim in state collateral proceedings. In the instant case, [*5] however, petitioner’s postconviction counsel did not raise the ineffective-assistance claim in the first collateral proceeding, and, indeed, filed a statement that, after reviewing the case, she found no meritorious claims helpful to petitioner. On federal habeas review, and with new counsel, petitioner sought to argue he had received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and in the first phase of his state collateral proceeding. Because the state collateral proceeding was the first place to challenge his conviction on grounds of ineffective assistance, petitioner maintained he had a constitutional right to an effective attorney in the collateral proceeding. While petitioner frames the question in this case as a constitutional one, a more narrow, but still dispositive, formulation is whether a federal habeas court may excuse a procedural default of an ineffective-assistance claim when the claim was not properly presented in state court due to an attorney’s errors in an initial-review collateral proceeding.
V — I A jury convicted petitioner, Luis Mariano Martinez, of two counts of sexual conduct with a minor under the age of 15. The prosecution introduced a videotaped forensic interview with the victim, Martinez’s 11-year-old stepdaughter. It also put in evidence the victim’s nightgown, with traces of Martinez’s DNA. As part of his defense, Martinez introduced evidence of the victim’s recantations, including testimony from the victim’s grandmother and mother and a second videotaped interview in which the victim denied any abuse. The victim also denied any abuse when she testified at trial. App. to Pet. for Cert. 38a-39a. To explain the inconsistencies, a prosecution expert testified that recantations of child-abuse accusations are caused often by reluctance on the part of the victim’s mother to lend support to the child’s claims. Pet. for Cert. 3. After considering the conflicting evidence, the jury convicted Martinez. He was sentenced to two consecutive terms of life imprisonment [*6] with no possibility of parole for 35 years. App. to Pet. for Cert. 39a.
Statutes cited
Cite this
Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.