Case law · Highest court · Ohio

State v. Perry

Decided
May 3, 1967
Docket
Nos. 40299, 40300, 40301 and 40302
Status
Published
Jurisdiction
Ohio

Cited 2,571 timesSuperseded by statute (verified)Possible negative treatment: superseded by statute (2 of 3 verified; none is a verified overruling) · State v. Smith

What later courts said

Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.

How the opinion begins

Taft, C. J.

These are appeals from judgments of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, affirming judgments of the Common Pleas Court, denying petitions for postconviction relief under Section 2953.21 et seq., Revised Code, by prisoners, who are in custody under sentence after conviction and are represented by counsel. In each case, the prisoner was represented by counsel at his trial, on appeal where taken from the judgment of conviction, and, where there was no such appeal, he was so represented until the time for appeal expired.

In denying relief in each case, the Common Pleas Court stated that it had made a “search of the files, transcripts and records of the case” and found “that there was no denial or infringement of the rights of” the prisoner “in any of the several respects claimed in his [or her] petition, so as to render the judgment void or voidable under the Ohio Constitution or the Constitution of the United States.”

Cite this

State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St. 2d 175 (1967)

Read the full opinion

Free account needed

Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.