Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross
- Decided
- February 21, 2006
- Docket
- 03-1269, 03-1286
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 3,273 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- concluding that term “steel baffles” was not a means-plus-function limitation where “[t]he claims and the specification unmistakably establish that the ‘steel baffles’ refer to particular physical apparatus” — Inventio AG v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Americas Corp. (2011)
- recognizing that “[t]he best source for understanding a technical term is the specification from which it arose, informed, as needed, by the prosecution history” — Synthon IP, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. (2006)
- concluding that patent claim’s reference to “steel baffles” “strongly implies that the term ‘baffles’ does not inherently mean objects made of steel” — Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. (2023)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON, in which Chief Judge MICHEL and Circuit Judges CLEVENGER, RADER, SCHALL, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, and PROST join; and in which Circuit Judge LOURIE joins with respect to parts I, II, III, V, and VI; [*1309] and in which Circuit Judge PAULINE NEWMAN joins with respect to parts I, II, III, and V. Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE, in which Circuit Judge PAULINE NEWMAN joins. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER, in which Circuit Judge PAULINE NEWMAN joins.
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Edward H. Phillips invented modular, steel-shell panels that can be welded together to form vandalism-resistant walls. The panels are especially useful in building prisons because they are load-bearing and impact-resistant, while also insulating against fire and noise. Mr. Phillips obtained a patent on the invention, U.S. Patent No. 4,677,798 (“the ’798 patent”), and he subsequently entered into an arrangement with AWH Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation (collectively “AWH”) to market and sell the panels. That arrangement ended in 1990. In 1991, however, Mr. Phillips received a sales brochure from AWH that suggested to him that AWH was continuing to use his trade secrets and patented technology without his consent. In a series of letters in 1991 and 1992, Mr. Phillips accused AWH of patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation. Correspondence between the parties regarding the matter ceased after that time.
Statutes cited
Cite this
Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross, 415 F.3d 1303 (2006)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.