Starr v. Baca
- Decided
- July 25, 2011
- Docket
- No. 09-55233
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 3,401 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that allegations must be sufficiently plausible “such that it is not unfair to require the opposing party to be subjected to the expense of discovery and continued litigation” — Osu Student Alliance v. Ed Ray (2012)
- holding that allegations must be sufficiently plausible “such that it is not unfair to require the opposing party to be sub- jected to the expense of discovery and continued litigation” — Osu Student Alliance v. Ed Ray (2012)
- holding that liability of a supervisor requires a causal connection between the supervisor’s misconduct and the constitutional violation committed by the subordinate — Weaver v. Menard (2021)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Opinion by Judge WILLIAM A. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge TROTT.
ORDER The opinion filed on February 11, 2011, and published at 633 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir.2011), is withdrawn and replaced by the attached opinion.
The petitions for rehearing and for rehearing en banc, filed February 25, 2011, are hereby denied as moot.
Statutes cited
Cite this
Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202 (2011)Read the full opinion
Free account needed
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.