United States v. Grostefon
- Decided
- March 22, 1982
- Docket
- No. 41,055; ACM S25116
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
Cited 2,786 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- explaining a defendant can personally raise issues on appeal that his counsel believes are frivolous — Steven M. Chapman v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II (2021)
- permitting military defendants to submit issues on appeal pro se even if defense counsel believes such issues are merit-less — Squire v. Ledwith (2017)
- explaining a defendant can personally raise issues on appeal that his counsel believes are frivolous — Bozicevich v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I (2023)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Opinion of the Court COOK, Judge:
The accused was tried by special court-martial on November 6 and 7,1980, and was convicted, despite his pleas, of wrongfully possessing marihuana and wrongfully introducing marihuana into a military installation, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The adjudged and approved sentence extends to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 3 months, forfeiture of $334 pay per month for 6 months, and reduction to airman basic.
On December 10, 1980, the accused executed a request for appellate representation and requested his appellate defense counsel “to urge in my behalf all errors or other matters which he may discover from the record of trial and accompanying papers, together with the errors and other matters listed below.” Listed on the accused’s Request for Appellate Defense Counsel (AF Form 304) were the following assertions: a. The Trial Court erred in refusing to grant the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress. b. The Trial Court erred in refusing to grant the Defendant’s Motion for a Finding of Not Guilty. c. The Trial Court erred in admitting prosecution exhibits 14 and 15. d. The Trial Court erred in finding the defendant guilty of the specifications and the charge.
Statutes cited
Cite this
United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (1982)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.