United States v. Sokolow
- Decided
- April 3, 1989
- Docket
- 87-1295
- Status
- Published
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
Cited 4,647 timesNo negative treatment found in this library
What later courts said
- holding that factors which by themselves were "quite consistent with innocent travel" collectively amounted to reasonable suspicion — United States v. Arvizu (2002)
- holding that factors which by them selves were “quite consistent with innocent travel” collectively amounted to reasonable suspicion — United States v. Arvizu (2002)
- holding that law enforcement agent could form a reasonable suspicion based on observation that defendant's conduct was consistent with a "drug courier profile" — United States v. Mario De Leon-Reyna (1991)
Each line is a later court’s own words about this case, not a summary. Read the opinion before relying on it.
How the opinion begins
Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court.
Respondent Andrew Sokolow was stopped by Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents upon his arrival at Honolulu International Airport. The agents found 1,063 grams of cocaine in his carry-on luggage. When respondent was stopped, the agents knew, inter alia, that (1) he paid $2,100 for two airplane tickets from a roll of $20 bills; (2) he traveled under a name that did not match the name under which his telephone number was listed; (3) his original destination was Miami, a source city for illicit drugs; (4) he stayed in Miami for only 48 hours, even though a round-trip flight from Honolulu to Miami takes 20 hours; (5) he appeared nervous during his trip; and (6) he checked none of his luggage. A divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the DEA agents did not have a reasonable suspicion to stop respondent, as required by the Fourth Amendment. 831 F. 2d 1413 (1987). We take the contrary view.
[*4] This case involves a typical attempt to smuggle drugs through one of the Nation’s airports.[1] On a Sunday in July 1984, respondent went to the United Airlines ticket counter at Honolulu Airport, where he purchased two round-trip tickets for a flight to Miami leaving later that day. The tickets were purchased in the names of “Andrew Kray” and “Janet Norian” and had open return dates. Respondent paid $2,100 for the tickets from a large roll of $20 bills, which appeared to contain a total of $4,000. He also gave the ticket agent his home telephone number. The ticket agent noticed that respondent seemed nervous; he was about 25 years old; he was dressed in a black jumpsuit and wore gold jewelry; and he was accompanied by a woman, who turned out to be Janet Norian. Neither respondent nor his companion checked any of their four pieces of luggage.
Statutes cited
Cite this
United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1 (1989)Read the full opinion
Reading the library on this site uses your account’s daily calls, the same as the connector and the API. The Free plan needs no card. Calls a day on each plan.